The Value of PSMA-RADS Version 2.0 in the Assessment of Pulmonary Metastases in Patients With Prostate Cancer and the Improvement of Differential Diagnosis Efficiency by PSMA PET/CT Parameters.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39192508.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005409.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the application of PSMA-RADS version 2.0 in assessment of pulmonary metastases in patients with prostate cancer and whether PSMA PET/CT parameters provide incremental value. From October 2016 to July 2023, PC patients with pulmonary opacities (including pulmonary metastases, lung cancer, and pulmonary benign opacities) who underwent Al 18 F-PSMA-BCH PET/CT scans were retrospectively analyzed. CT imaging characteristics, including the longest diameter, density, smoothness, lobulation, pleural retraction, and vacuole sign, as well as PET parameters including SUV max and tumor-to-background ratio, were measured and analyzed. Additionally, the pulmonary PSMA-RADS score for each patient was determined. Independent predictors of pulmonary metastases were identified through univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis, which were utilized to construct a parallel diagnostic test. The differential diagnostic performances were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. A total of 148 pulmonary opacities from 96 patients were retrospectively included. The number of pulmonary benign opacities, lung cancer, and pulmonary metastases were 48 (32.4%), 20 (13.5%), and 80 (54.1%), respectively. The number of opacities across different PSMA-RADS scores from 2 to 5 was 8 (5.4%), 88 (59.5%), 7 (4.7%), and 45 (30.4%). SUV max and smooth edges were independent predictors of pulmonary metastases (both P < 0.05), and the AUC of the parallel test for these 2 parameters was 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.79, 0.94; P < 0.001). Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of the parallel test across PSMA-RADS score from 2 to 5 was 85.7%, 79.6%, 100%, and 92.9%, respectively. Al 18 F-PSMA-BCH PET/CT parameters were helpful in differentiating pulmonary metastases in PC patients and provided incremental value when integrated with PSMA-RADS version 2.0.
Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
- Lung Neoplasms