Population-based screening strategies for biliary atresia in the newborn: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39197055.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0307837 and PMC identifier 11357077.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Newborn screening for biliary atresia (BA) may facilitate earlier diagnosis and intervention for improved clinical outcomes. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of population-based screening strategies for BA in the newborn using PRISMA-DTA guidelines. We included cohort or cross-sectional studies. The screening (index) tests included stool color card (SCC) and direct/conjugated bilirubin (DB/CB) and the reference standard was intraoperative cholangiogram. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects logistic regression models. We included 15 studies (1,816,722 participants) that assessed 5 different population-based screening strategies. QUADAS-2 assessment revealed high risk of bias for patient selection in one study and uncertain risks for reference standard in multiple studies. High certainty evidence suggests that DB/CB assessed after birth had a summary sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 100,100) and specificity of 98.8% (98.8,98.9) (5 studies, 662141 participants). Moderate certainty evidence suggests that SCC screening at a month of age had summary sensitivity of 79.6% (95% CI 70.6, 86.4) and specificity of 99.9% (95% CI 99.9, 99.9) (7 studies, 996262 participants). DB/CB in the first few days of life has the best diagnostic accuracy for population screening for biliary atresia in the newborn. Future research should focus on cost-effectiveness and combinations of screening strategies.
Medical subject headings
- Biliary Atresia
- Neonatal Screening