Adaptation and development of the instruction manual for a videoconference-based Motor Assessment Scale: validity, reliability and measurement error of Tele-MAS.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39206777.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1080/09638288.2024.2395474.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To develop an instruction manual to administer the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) <i>via</i> videoconferencing (Tele-MAS), investigate its validity, reliability and measurement error. In-person assessment, conducted at the participant's home, was compared to remote assessment conducted by rater A. Then, within two days, the rater B, repeat the remote assessment (<i>n</i> = 41). Part of the sample (<i>n</i> = 10) was assessed again within seven days by rater A to determine test-retest reliability. Concurrent validity, agreement of alternate forms (in-person x remote) for total score and reliability of individual items were analyzed using respectively the Pearson correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plots and weighted Kappa (Kw). Interrater and test-retest reliability were analyzed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimal detectable changes (MDC) were computed. The Tele-MAS instruction manual was developed. In-person MAS and Tele-MAS present a high positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.97). Bland-Altman plots showed adequate agreement (MD=-0.0 point). Most Individual items showed excellent reliability (Kw > 0.70). Tele-MAS showed excellent interrater (ICC<sub>(2,1)</sub>=0.92) and test-retest (ICC<sub>(3,1)</sub>=0.98) reliability. Tele-MAS presents a SEM = 3% and MDC = 8%. The Tele-MAS is a valid and reliable global motor assessment scale to be applied in individuals after stroke.
Medical subject headings
- Videoconferencing
- Disability Evaluation
- Stroke Rehabilitation