The economic impacts of ecosystem disruptions: Costs from substituting biological pest control.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39236171.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1126/science.adg0344.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Biodiversity loss is accelerating, yet we know little about how these ecosystem disruptions affect human well-being. Ecologists have documented both the importance of bats as natural predators of insects as well as their population declines after the emergence of a wildlife disease, resulting in a potential decline in biological pest control. In this work, I study how species interactions can extend beyond an ecosystem and affect agriculture and human health. I find that farmers compensated for bat decline by increasing their insecticide use by 31.1%. The compensatory increase in insecticide use by farmers adversely affected health-human infant mortality increased by 7.9% in the counties that experienced bat die-offs. These findings provide empirical validation to previous theoretical predictions about how ecosystem disruptions can have meaningful social costs.
Medical subject headings
- Biodiversity
- Chiroptera
- Pest Control, Biological
- Infant Mortality