Content and readability of patient educational materials about neuromodulation for childhood movement disorders.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39246137.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1080/09638288.2024.2397078.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To assess content and readability of online patient educational materials (PEMs) for paediatric deep brain stimulation (DBS) and intrathecal baclofen (ITB). A content analysis of PEMs identified from top children's hospitals, institutions affiliated with published neuromodulation research, and DBS and ITB device manufacturers was conducted. PEM content was analysed using a predetermined framework. Readability was assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG). Of 109 PEMs (72 DBS; 37 ITB) identified, most (77 (71%)) originated in the United States. More ITB PEMs (27 (73%)) contained specific paediatric information than DBS PEMs (16 (22%)). PEMS more frequently described benefits (DBS: 92%; ITB: 89%) than risks (DBS: 49%; ITB: 78%). Frequent content included pre- and post-operative care, procedural details, and device information. Less common content included long-term lifestyle considerations, alternatives, patient experiences, and financial details. Median readability of PEMs was 13.2 (interquartile range [IQR]: 11.4-14.45) for DBS and 11.8 (IQR: 11-12.9) for ITB. Available ITB and DBS PEMs often miss important broader details of the treatments, and have additional shortcomings such as poor readability scores. Our findings highlight need for more holistic content within neuromodulation PEMs, improved accessibility, and more balanced representation of risks and benefits.
Medical subject headings
- Deep Brain Stimulation
- Patient Education as Topic
- Comprehension
- Movement Disorders
- Baclofen