Prompt engineering to increase GPT3.5's performance on the Plastic Surgery In-Service Exams.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39255523.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.001.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study assesses ChatGPT's (GPT-3.5) performance on the 2021 ASPS Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination using prompt modifications and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). ChatGPT was instructed to act as a "resident," "attending," or "medical student," and RAG utilized a curated vector database for context. Results showed no significant improvement, with the "resident" prompt yielding the highest accuracy at 54%, and RAG failing to enhance performance, with accuracy remaining at 54.3%. Despite appropriate reasoning when correct, ChatGPT's overall performance fell in the 10th percentile, indicating the need for fine-tuning and more sophisticated approaches to improve AI's utility in complex medical tasks.
Medical subject headings
- Surgery, Plastic
- Educational Measurement
- Clinical Competence