MR elastography vs a combination of common non-invasive tests for estimation of severe liver fibrosis in patients with hepatobiliary tumors.

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of combined imaging and blood test indices related to liver fibrosis (LF) compared to magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for estimating severe LF (F3-4) in preoperative patients. This retrospective study included patients who underwent MRE, gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI, and dynamic CT before liver resection. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using MRE, liver-to-spleen signal intensity ratio (LSR) using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, and spleen volume normalized to body surface area (SV/BSA) using CT volumetry were measured. Laboratory parameters, including levels of type IV collagen 7S and hyaluronic acid, were also measured. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to identify parameters that could estimate severe LF more accurately than LSM alone. A total of 81 patients (mean age, 67 years ± 9.9 [SD]; 58 men) were enrolled. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that LSR (odds ratio [OR]: 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.37, p < 0.001), SV/BSA (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, p = 0.03) and type IV collagen 7S (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.12-3.00, p = 0.02) were associated with severe LF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that for estimating severe LF, the area under the curve was significantly larger for the combination of LSR, SV/BSA, and type IV collagen 7S than for LSM alone (0.95 vs 0.85, p = 0.04). The combined evaluation of LSR, SV/BSA, and type IV collagen 7S obtained by clinically common preoperative examinations was more accurate than MRE alone for estimating severe LF in preoperative patients. Question What indicators among the imaging and blood tests commonly performed preoperatively can provide a more accurate estimate of severe LF compared to MRE? Findings The combination of LSR, SV/BSA, and type IV collagen 7S was more accurate than an LSM alone for estimating severe LF. Clinical relevance A combination of commonly performed non-invasive preoperative tests provides a more accurate estimation of severe LF than MR elastography, an examination with relatively limited.