Unmasking biases and navigating pitfalls in the ophthalmic artificial intelligence lifecycle: A narrative review.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39378192.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000618 and PMC identifier 11460710.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Over the past 2 decades, exponential growth in data availability, computational power, and newly available modeling techniques has led to an expansion in interest, investment, and research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. Ophthalmology is one of many fields that seek to benefit from AI given the advent of telemedicine screening programs and the use of ancillary imaging. However, before AI can be widely deployed, further work must be done to avoid the pitfalls within the AI lifecycle. This review article breaks down the AI lifecycle into seven steps-data collection; defining the model task; data preprocessing and labeling; model development; model evaluation and validation; deployment; and finally, post-deployment evaluation, monitoring, and system recalibration-and delves into the risks for harm at each step and strategies for mitigating them.