Rethinking Measures and Mortality Attribution in Health Care: The ENT Example.

Abstract

National performance metrics ultimately enhance patient decision-making and promote meaningful improvements in health care delivery, which makes having valid and reliable measures essential. This study examined US News and World Report metrics from 2019 to 2012 and used electronic health record data, combined with detailed chart review across 3 in-system hospitals, to assess the provision of care compared to the attribution of patients assigned to the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) mortality group. Of the initial 47 ENT-attributed deaths, 23 of those were verified, dimensioning the mortality rate from 1.7% to just 0.8%. These results underscore the necessity of rethinking measures and mortality attribution methodologies to be more accurate. Current methods use Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group billing coding to map the attribution. We suggest transitioning away from specialty ranking approaches and towards a procedure and condition "rating" approach to ensure that these ranking types capture data about the provision of care within a given encounter.