The Effect of Forearm Shortening on Finger Flexion: A Biomechanical Study.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39396359.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.09.005.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Surgeons may shorten the forearm for many indications. We quantified the impact of shortening on finger flexion with a cadaver model. Ten fresh cadaver proximal forearms were pinned to a static block. We pinned each distal forearm/hand to a block that could unlock, slide, and relock on a mounting track. This block allowed wrist-neutral or 30-degree extension. With the sliding block locked, we removed the central 10 cm of the radius/ulna. We placed sutures in the proximal end of each flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). After pretensioning, we simulated near-maximum baseline FDP muscle-generating force by applying 100 N via a load cell at the proximal sutures. We then anchored the load cell system proximally to set the initial length-tension relationship for simulating near-maximum baseline muscle-generating force. We called subsequent load cell readings the simulated muscle force (SMF) and pressure sensor readings between fingertips and the palm the tip-to-palm force (TPF). We shortened the forearm in 1 cm increments with the distal sliding-locking block. At each increment, we recorded SMF and TPF in the wrist-neutral position. Once a specimen lost measurable TPF, we applied 30 degrees wrist extension until again losing TPF. Incremental forearm shortening was associated with exponential decreases in each FDP's SMF and TPF. In wrist-neutral, 3 cm mean shortening had a loss of 99% and 98% SMF and TPF, respectively. Wrist extension marginally improved SMF and TPF up to 4 cm mean shortening, where both lost 99%. Loss of any fingertip touchdown occurred after a mean shortening of 4.9 cm in wrist-neutral and 5.3 cm in 30 degrees wrist extension. Mean forearm shortening of 3 or 4 cm had a near-complete loss of FDP SMF and TPF in wrist-neutral/wrist extension, respectively. With ∼5 cm shortening, there was a complete loss of fingertip touchdown. Surgeons should consider the influence of forearm shortening on the FDPs and contemplate flexor tendon shortening or alternative reconstructions as indicated.
Medical subject headings
- Forearm
- Range of Motion, Articular
- Fingers
- Finger Joint
Anatomy
- radius/ulna