Empirical antibiotic therapy for sepsis: save the anaerobic microbiota.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39401510.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00257-1.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Antibiotics are fundamental in sepsis management; however, the optimal empirical treatment remains debated. Despite anaerobes rarely being the causative pathogen of sepsis, antibiotics targeting them are frequently used, which might lead to unintended consequences. Multiple studies have shown that depletion of commensal anaerobic gut microbes by anti-anaerobic antibiotics influences systemic immunity and is associated with increased mortality in patients with sepsis. However, this knowledge has not yet been translated into clinical practice. When considering empirical coverage of anaerobic pathogens in sepsis, most physicians advocate for a better-safe-than-sorry approach. In this Viewpoint, we argue that anti-anaerobic antibiotics could often result in being sorry rather than safe. We provide an overview of the limited necessity of anaerobic coverage and the potential detrimental effects of anaerobic depletion in sepsis. We aim to raise anaerobic awareness to reduce the unnecessary use of anti-anaerobic antibiotics in empirical sepsis treatment and improve patient outcomes.
Medical subject headings
- Sepsis
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome