Editorial Commentary: Rate of Meniscal Repair Versus Meniscectomy Has Improved and Should Continue to Improve.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39401688.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.006.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
As a result of research supporting meniscus preservation, evidence shows that internationally, there has been a rise in rates of meniscus repair, especially in younger population, and a decline in rates of partial meniscectomy. The decline in partial meniscectomy has been rather rapid and has outpaced the rise in meniscal repair, likely due to increasing evidence against routine partial meniscectomy in degenerative tears with coexistent arthritis. However, despite the rise in meniscus repair, close to 95% of meniscus surgeries are still partial meniscectomies. The partial meniscectomy to meniscus repair ratio seems to be rather high. Optimistically, this will improve because successful repair outcomes have been demonstrated in situations previously considered "high-risk," including complex patterns, central tears, radial tears, and root and ramp tears. This may be due to multiple factors, many of which may be beyond the control of surgeons, including the fact that as many as 25% of repairs fail to heal. Yet, with improved techniques and instrumentation, the success rate of repair is improving. The cost of repair may be a limiting factor, especially in low-income countries with poor health insurance penetration and unfavorable reimbursement of repair cost. Every effort must be made to repair a tear, which has potential to heal.
Medical subject headings
- Meniscectomy
- Tibial Meniscus Injuries
- Menisci, Tibial
- Arthroscopy