Research capacity and culture: a survey of Australian Orthopaedic Association members.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39428481.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1186/s13018-024-05108-w and PMC identifier 11492767.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Strong research capacity and culture (RCC) within professional groups predict engagement in high-quality research and the integration of evidence into practice. However, factors affecting RCC participation and development are currently unknown in Australian Orthopaedic Surgeons. Cross-sectional survey. All Australian Orthopaedic Association members were invited to complete the individual domain of the validated Research Capacity and Culture tool. One hundred and sixty-three Australian Orthopaedic Association members (9%) provided survey answers. Survey findings indicated that AOA members scored moderate or high for most RCC domains (14 out of 15). Barriers to the completion of research included a lack of time, other work roles taking priority, and a lack of funds for research. The Australian Orthopaedic Association members surveyed in this study demonstrated adequate research skills and experience, although reported they could benefit from additional support securing funding and navigating specific research tasks. Increasing future collaboration with academic institutions and clinician-researcher roles may enhance the output of high-quality orthopaedic research in Australia.
Medical subject headings
- Orthopedics
- Biomedical Research