Bureaucrat incentives reduce crop burning and child mortality in South Asia.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39443790.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-08046-z and PMC identifier 11525172.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Air pollution in South Asia is a health emergency, responsible for 2 million deaths every year<sup>1</sup>. Crop residue burning accounts for 40-60% of peak pollution during the winter harvest months<sup>2,3</sup>. Despite being illegal, this practice remains widespread<sup>4,5</sup>. Any solution to curb the problem necessitates government action at scale. Here we study whether leveraging the incentives of bureaucrats tasked with controlling burning can mitigate this phenomenon. Using a decade of wind, fire and health data from satellites and surveys from the Demographic and Health Surveys Program, we show that crop burning responds to bureaucrat incentives: fires increase by 15% when wind is most likely to direct pollution to neighbouring jurisdictions, and decrease by 14.5% when it pollutes their own. These effects intensify with stronger bureaucratic incentives and capacity. We also find that bureaucrat action against burning deters future polluters, further reducing fires by 13%. Finally, using an atmospheric model, we estimate that one log increase in in utero exposure to pollution from burning raises child mortality by 30-36 deaths per 1,000 births, underscoring the importance of bureaucrat action. Contrary to the growing beliefs that the problem of crop burning is intractable<sup>6,7</sup>, these findings highlight specific ways in which existing bureaucrats, when properly incentivized, can improve environmental management and public health outcomes.
Medical subject headings
- Agriculture
- Air Pollution
- Child Mortality
- Crops, Agricultural
- Fires
- Motivation
- Government Regulation