Validity and reliability of torso- versus waist-worn inertial measurement units in the assessment of vertical jumps.

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to compare the reliability and validity of jump variables determined from torso- and waist-worn inertial measurement units (IMU) in comparison to force platform measures. Twenty-seven students-athletes completed eight countermovement (CMJ) and squat jumps (SJ) on a force platform with IMUs mounted on the pelvis and torso. Variables including jump height and phase-specific duration, impulse and power were calculated from force platform and both IMUs independently. Considering both IMU locations, the coefficients of variation (CV) observed for all CMJ variables were ≤ 2.5 % larger than the force platform with the exception of concentric impulse with the torso-worn worn IMU (6.9 %). Differences in CVs observed between IMU and force platform variables appeared greater in the SJ. For velocity-derived jump height and concentric impulse from both IMU placements, and torso-worn IMU mean power, CVs were > 2.5 % larger than the force platform. Both IMU placements overestimated jump height determined by flight time (+22 to +35 %) and underestimated jump height determined by take-off velocity (-10 to -18 %). In conclusion, the reliability of IMU metrics was largely comparable to the force platform. However, systematic bias was observed for most metrics. Practitioners should exercise caution if seeking to model jump performance with IMUs.