Comparative study of the relationship between empathy and motivation among undergraduate students of new curriculum and old curriculum.

Abstract

The new competency-based curriculum incorporates the social sciences and humanism to the basic and clinical sciences, thus giving an integrated approach to medical education. Comparing the empathy score with the motivation level across the two curricula was thus planned to assess the current status. A cross-sectional qualitative study using an Internet-based electronic survey containing both an academic motivation scale to assess the motivation level and Jefferson's scale of empathy was used to assess empathy score. From the above study, we concluded that males have a higher empathy score across both the curricula. >95% of students of both categories belonged to the High Intrinsic High Control motivational category. The empathy scores were slightly higher among the CBME (Competency Based Medical Education) group compared to the non-CBME group, but it was not statistically significant. In subgroup analysis, Phase 3 was found to have a significant association. The majority of the students fall in the High Intrinsic High Control category, where they have the next highest level of empathy. Phase 2 was found to have a significant association; it could be because of the positive effects of AETCOM classes on the ready-to-enter clinical exposure batch. The study also revealed that while motivation and empathy are generally linked, outliers existed, particularly among participants with low initial motivation but high empathy. This suggests a potential association between extrinsic motivation and empathy, possibly influenced by external factors.