Estimating the impact of imported malaria on local transmission in a near elimination setting: a case study from Bhutan.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39492850.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100497 and PMC identifier 11530917.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Bhutan has achieved a substantial reduction in both malaria morbidity and mortality over the last two decades and is aiming for malaria elimination certification in 2025. However, a significant percentage of malaria cases in Bhutan are imported (acquired in another country). The aim of the study was to understand how importation drives local malaria transmission in Bhutan. Information on geo-located individual-level laboratory-confirmed malaria cases between 2016 and 2020 was obtained from the Bhutan Vector-borne Disease Control Program. Records included the date of diagnosis and treatment, type of cases classified as indigenous or imported, and malaria species. Hawkes Processes were used to study the role of imported malaria in local transmission in Bhutan. We imposed 15 days delay for a mosquito to become infectious in the model. There were 285 cases during the study period and 58.6% (159) were imported malaria. 71.1% (113) of these imported cases were <i>Plasmodium vivax</i> and 73.6% (117) were from India. The model suggested that a person remains infectious for 8 days for <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> malaria but over 19 days for <i>P. vivax.</i> The background intensity from imported malaria cases was much greater for <i>P. vivax</i> cases (maximum 0.17) resulting in more importations than <i>P. falciparum</i> cases (maximum 0.06). However, model fitting suggested that local <i>P. falciparum</i> transmission was mainly driven by importations but additional factors such as relapse played a role for <i>P. vivax</i>. Imported malaria cases are key drivers of transmission within Bhutan, with most cases since 2016 being <i>P. vivax</i>. Control programmes should be devised to target interventions towards the <i>P. vivax</i> strain and test those who are more likely to bring in imported malaria cases or acquire it from returning travellers. None.