Preoperative assessment of pancreatic cancer with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR versus [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective preliminary study.

Zhang, Zeyu; Guo, Shiwei; Su, Weiwei; Pan, Guixia; Cao, Kai; Jiang, Hui; Zhang, Lu; Cheng, Chao et al. · Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging · 2025

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

To assess the diagnostic performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer and compare it with that of [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Thirty-one patients with pancreatic cancer underwent preoperative [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR, [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT, and CECT imaging. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed two sets of images (set 1, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR; set 2, [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT) and reached a consensus on tumour resectability, N staging (N0 or N positive) and M staging (M0 or M1). Based on the above indices, the resectability of the tumour was determined according to a five-point scale. Clinical, operative, and pathological findings were used as a reference standard to compare the diagnostic performance of the two imaging sets via the McNemar test. The diagnostic performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging was not significantly different from that of [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging in the assessment of tumour resectability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.854 vs. 0.775, p = 0.192), N staging [accuracy: 82.4% (14 of 17 patients) vs. 58.8% (10 of 17 patients), p = 0.125] and M staging [accuracy: 100% (31 of 31 patients) vs. 90.3% (28 of 31 patients), p = 0.250]. However, compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging changed the M stage in three patients by upstaging from M0 to M1 in 2 patients and downstaging from M1 to M0 in 2 patients. In 13 patients with liver metastases, the number of liver metastases detected via [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging was greater than that detected via [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging (324 vs. 240). In 3 patients with peritoneal metastases, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging detected more peritoneal metastases than did [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT imaging. [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR imaging has diagnostic accuracy comparable to [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT plus CECT in terms of preoperative staging and assessment of resectability in pancreatic cancer; additionally, it exhibits superior capability in detecting liver and peritoneal metastases. Consequently, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/MR has the potential to become a one-stop imaging tool for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer.

Medical subject headings