A head-to-head comparison of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of lung cancer.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39516377.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00259-024-06976-4.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of lung cancer patients. A prospective study was conducted between March 2023 and July 2023. Patients with high clinical suspicion of lung cancer were recruited. Each participant underwent PET/CT scanning using [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG within 6 days. Histopathology and clinical follow-up results serve as reference criteria for final diagnosis. We used a paired samples t-test or a Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the uptake of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG. The diagnostic performance between the two tracers was compared using the McNemar χ² test. A total of 101 participants were included (mean age 63.267 ± 9.344 [range 39-86 years]). In benign lung lesions, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 had lower TBR and SUVmax than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (2.924 vs. 5.705, P < 0.001;1.395 vs. 4.014, P < 0.001). The TBR of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 in benign lymph nodes was also lower than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (0.880 vs. 1.25, P < 0.001). [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 had a higher diagnostic specificity for primary tumors than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (52% vs. 28%, P = 0.031). The specificity, accuracy, and PPV of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 for detecting lymph node metastasis were 82.54%, 78.66%, and 53.73%, respectively, higher than that of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (53.80%, P < 0.001, 63.15%, P < 0.001 and 38.35%, P = 0.003). However, its sensitivity in the diagnosis of lymph node and distant metastasis was not as good as [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (P < 0.001, P = 0.016, respectively). There was a significant correlation between [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 uptake and FGFR1 expression (Spearman r = 0.6901, p < 0.0001). [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 PET/CT had higher specificity than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT for the detection of primary lung cancer. In addition, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 PET/CT also had higher diagnostic accuracy, specificity, and NPV for lymph node metastasis, but its diagnostic sensitivity for metastatic lesions was lower than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT. Therefore, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 can be used as an effective supplement to [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG to a certain extent.
Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1
- Organometallic Compounds