Keeping the global consumption within the planetary boundaries.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39537917.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-08154-w and PMC identifier 11578892.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The disparity in environmental impacts across different countries has been widely acknowledged<sup>1,2</sup>. However, ascertaining the specific responsibility within the complex interactions of economies and consumption groups remains a challenging endeavour<sup>3-5</sup>. Here, using an expenditure database that includes up to 201 consumption groups across 168 countries, we investigate the distribution of 6 environmental footprint indicators and assess the impact of specific consumption expenditures on planetary boundary transgressions. We show that 31-67% and 51-91% of the planetary boundary breaching responsibility could be attributed to the global top 10% and top 20% of consumers, respectively, from both developed and developing countries. By following an effective mitigation pathway, the global top 20% of consumers could adopt the consumption levels and patterns that have the lowest environmental impacts within their quintile, yielding a reduction of 25-53% in environmental pressure. In this scenario, actions focused solely on the food and services sectors would reduce environmental pressure enough to bring land-system change and biosphere integrity back within their respective planetary boundaries. Our study highlights the critical need to focus on high-expenditure consumers for effectively addressing planetary boundary transgressions.
Medical subject headings
- Conservation of Natural Resources
- Developed Countries
- Developing Countries
- Internationality