A reproducible method for evaluating the degree and direction of overstuffing of the humeral head component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39552655.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/17585732241258069 and PMC identifier 11562209.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Improper sizing of the humeral head component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) can overstuff the joint, potentially compromising outcomes. The purpose of this study was to validate a novel method of evaluating glenohumeral joint overstuffing in which superoinferior and mediolateral overstuffing can be evaluated independently relative to the native humeral anatomy. We identified 25 patients who underwent ATSA and the best Grashey radiograph taken within 1 year of follow-up was assessed using our proposed technique. First, a circle overlaying the implanted humeral head was made. Then, Iannotti's Perfect Circle (IPC) was drawn as originally described. Measurements of superior and medial overstuffing were made using our proposed axes. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by computing interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) using a one-way model. Measurements were summarized as the mean and range, with positive values denoting overstuffing. The inter-rater reliability for all measurements was excellent (ICC > 0.9). Compared to our method, the IPC method would have missed 77% of overstuffed cases. We present a reproducible method to assess glenohumeral joint overstuffing in ATSA. This technique addresses limitations of other methods that underestimate overstuffing. Further study is needed to establish a clinically significant value of overstuffing based on the proposed method.
Anatomy
- shoulder
- humerus