Geological Net Zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39557072.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-08326-8.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Achieving net-zero global emissions of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), with declining emissions of other greenhouse gases, is widely expected to halt global warming. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions will continue to drive warming until fully balanced by active anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> removals. For practical reasons, however, many greenhouse gas accounting systems allow some 'passive' CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, such as enhanced vegetation growth owing to CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization, to be included as removals in the definition of net anthropogenic emissions. By including passive CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, nominal net-zero emissions would not halt global warming, undermining the Paris Agreement. Here we discuss measures to address this problem, to ensure residual fossil fuel use does not cause further global warming: land management categories should be disaggregated in emissions reporting and targets to better separate the role of passive CO<sub>2</sub> uptake; where possible, claimed removals should be additional to passive uptake; and targets should acknowledge the need for Geological Net Zero, meaning one tonne of CO<sub>2</sub> permanently restored to the solid Earth for every tonne still generated from fossil sources. We also argue that scientific understanding of Net Zero provides a basis for allocating responsibility for the protection of passive carbon sinks during and after the transition to Geological Net Zero.