Pervasive fire danger continued under a negative emission scenario.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39562546.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41467-024-54339-2 and PMC identifier 11576758.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Enhanced fire-prone weather under greenhouse gas warming can significantly affect local and global carbon budgets from increased fire occurrence, influencing carbon-climate feedbacks. However, the extent to which changes in fire-prone weather and associated carbon emissions can be mitigated by negative emissions remains uncertain. Here, we analyze fire weather responses in CO<sub>2</sub> removal climate model experiments and estimate their potential carbon emissions based on an observational relationship between fire weather and fire-induced CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. The results highlight that enhanced fire danger under global warming cannot be restored instantaneously by CO<sub>2</sub> reduction, mainly due to atmospheric dryness maintained by climatic inertia. The exacerbated fire danger is projected to contribute to extra CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in 68% of global regions due to the hysteresis of climate responses to CO<sub>2</sub> levels. These findings highlight that even under global cooling from negative emissions, increased fire activity may reinforce the fire-carbon-climate feedback loop and result in further socio-economic damage.