Anterior Column Support With Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Through Posterior Approach Maneuver: A Technical Note and Preliminary Radiologic Report.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39564998.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001720.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Retrospective cohort study. To evaluate the feasibility of anterior column support through a posterior approach using an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) cage. Anterior fusion is an effective way to maintain spinal lordosis; however, it may be technically difficult in some cases. Conventional lumbar fusion and spinal deformity correction surgeries were performed using a conventional ALIF cage with a modified extratransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (ExTLIF). Patients with 1 or 2 fusion levels were classified into group 1, and those with spinal deformity correction were classified into group 2. Radiologic parameters were evaluated during the follow-up periods. A total of 51 patients underwent this procedure. Thirty-five patients (19 male and 16 female, 69.4±9.6 y old) with 37 fusion sites were in group 1, and 16 patients (3 male and 13 female, 71.4±5.7 y old) were in group 2. The mean follow-up periods of groups 1 and 2 were 12.3±3.4 and 10.7±4.7 months, respectively. In group 1, the mean lumbar lordosis and segmental lumbar lordosis increased significantly during the last follow-up (39.9±13.0 and 20.6±6.0 degrees, respectively, both P <0.001), and the mean disc space also increased at the last follow-up ( P <0.001). The same was observed in group 2 with significant increases in the mean lumbar lordosis and segmental lumbar lordosis at the last of the follow-up period (46.8±9.3 and 16.9±8.9 degrees, respectively, both P <0.001). The disc space also increased significantly ( P <0.001). Fusion rates were 94.2% and 87.5% in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and the corresponding subsidence rates were 85.4% and 68.8%. In group 1, there was a significant correlation between subsidence and cage height ( P =0.046). This procedure (ExTLIF) can be applied in cases where an anterior approach is contraindicated as well as for deformity correction. Level III.
Medical subject headings
- Spinal Fusion
- Lumbar Vertebrae
Anatomy
- lumbar spine