Using human factors methods to mitigate bias in artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39569464.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocae291 and PMC identifier 11756570.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To highlight the often overlooked role of user interface (UI) design in mitigating bias in artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support (CDS). This perspective paper discusses the interdependency between AI-based algorithm development and UI design and proposes strategies for increasing the safety and efficacy of CDS. The role of design in biasing user behavior is well documented in behavioral economics and other disciplines. We offer an example of how UI designs play a role in how bias manifests in our machine learning-based CDS development. Much discussion on bias in AI revolves around data quality and algorithm design; less attention is given to how UI design can exacerbate or mitigate limitations of AI-based applications. This work highlights important considerations including the role of UI design in reinforcing/mitigating bias, human factors methods for identifying issues before an application is released, and risk communication strategies.
Medical subject headings
- Decision Support Systems, Clinical
- Artificial Intelligence
- User-Computer Interface
- Ergonomics