Curation and reporting of pathogenic genome-wide copy-number variants in a prenatal cell-free DNA screen.

Abstract

Advances in fetal fraction amplification in prenatal cell-free DNA screening now allow for high-resolution detection of copy-number variants (CNVs). However, approaches to interpreting CNVs as part of a primary screen are still evolving and require consensus. Here, we present a conservative, patient-centered framework for reporting fetal CNVs. Syndromes described in the literature were evaluated for inclusion based on a definable minimal critical region, disease severity, penetrance, and age of onset. The reporting framework required that a CNV overlap a defined minimal critical region and/or that it be ≥5 Mb and contain at least 1 OMIM disease-associated gene. This framework was then applied to CNVs identified from a cohort of 313,544 prenatal cfDNA screening patient samples. Patient-friendly terminology describing syndrome phenotypes was developed by scientists with training in genetic counseling. 65 syndromes met criteria for inclusion and represented the second most common class of CNVs in a retrospective cohort, more so than an established panel of microdeletions (1p36, 4p, 5p, 15q11.2-q13, and 22q11.2). Frequencies were concordant with reported syndrome incidence rates. The most common CNVs were those ≥5 Mb encompassing an OMIM disease gene(s). This framework for genome-wide fetal-CNV reporting carefully prioritizes findings with the potential to affect reproductive decision making.