Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Small Biopsies From the Bile Duct and Ampulla.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39603257.
- Also identified by DOI 10.5858/arpa.2024-0160-RA.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Histopathologic evaluation of bile duct and ampullary biopsies can be challenging. Biopsies from these sites are often tiny, scant, and/or fragmented. When assessing these biopsies, there is significant overlap between reactive atypia and malignancy, in situ precursor lesions can be misinterpreted as malignancy, and nonprimary tumors can mimic primary disease. To provide diagnostic pearls and pitfalls in the evaluation of small biopsies from the biliary tract. Literature review of published studies and the author's own observations. Because the procedures for obtaining specimens from the bile duct and ampulla are invasive, pathologists need to try to make definitive diagnoses. Diagnostic clues/pearls, ancillary studies, and recognition of various pitfalls can assist in providing accurate and confident diagnoses.
Medical subject headings
- Ampulla of Vater
- Bile Ducts
- Bile Duct Neoplasms
- Common Bile Duct Neoplasms