Evaluating the diagnostic performance of [<sup>18</sup>F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in gastric cancer: a comparative study with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39604653.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-024-11219-z and PMC identifier 12081493.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
To compare the diagnostic value of [<sup>18</sup>F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in gastric cancer. This single-center retrospective analysis included 65 patients with gastric cancer who received both [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>18</sup>F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for initial staging or restaging. Histopathological manifestations, typical imaging manifestations, follow-up imaging, and comprehensive clinical assessment were used as reference criteria. The uptakes of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>18</sup>F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. McNemar's test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance of the two imaging techniques. A total of 65 patients were included (26 male and 39 female; mean age, 54.03 ± 10.41 years), Among them, 10 were newly diagnosed, 46 underwent radical gastrectomy, and 9 received only chemotherapy prior to the study. Compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, [<sup>18</sup>F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed higher sensitivity in primary or recurrent tumors (100% vs. 64.52%, p < 0.001)), lymph node metastases (88.89% vs. 38.89%, p = 0.006), distant metastases (91.18% vs. 50%, p < 0.001). From the semi-quantitative evaluation, the Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio of [<sup>18</sup>F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were significantly higher than that of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in primary or recurrent tumors, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases (all p < 0.001). Our study results indicate that [<sup>18</sup>F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT outperforms [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in the detection of primary or recurrent tumors, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis in gastric cancer. Question Early diagnosis and precise staging of gastric cancer are crucial for patient prognosis; however, current imaging techniques still face significant limitations. Findings [<sup>18</sup>F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in detecting primary or recurrent tumors and metastases in patients with gastric cancer. Clinical relevance [<sup>18</sup>F]ALF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT is an advanced imaging diagnostic technique that significantly enhances the diagnostic accuracy for gastric cancer and its metastatic lesions. This technology provides robust support for clinical decision-making, thereby improving the management of patients with gastric cancer.
Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18