Toxicity and Efficacy of Different Target Volume Delineations of Radiation Therapy Based on the Updated Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/National Research Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Guidelines in Patients With Grade 3-4 Glioma: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39615657.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.094.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of grade 3-4 glioma by comparing the updated Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/National Research Group (NRG) with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines for target volume delineation. A total of 245 patients with newly diagnosed World Health Organization grade 3-4 glioma were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to undergo postoperative RT with concurrent and maintenance temozolomide. The radiation target volume delineation was determined by using either the updated RTOG/NRG (n = 122) or EORTC guidelines (n = 123). The primary endpoint was the toxicity associated with treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were considered secondary endpoints. No differences in low- or high-grade toxicities between the 2 groups, and neither group exhibited grade 5 toxicities. No significant differences in neurologic toxicities were observed between the RTOG/NRG and EORTC groups. The median PFS in the RTOG/NRG group and the EORTC group was 11.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-14.9 months) and 10.0 months (95% CI, 3.8-16.2 months), respectively (P = .73). The median OS in the RTOG/NRG group and the EORTC group was 19.5 months (95% CI, 14.2-24.8 months) and 18.5 months (95% CI, 12.8-24.2 months), respectively (P = .80). In patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma, there were no significant differences between the RTOG/NRG group and the EORTC group in median PFS (8.0 months [95% CI, 6.8-9.2 months] vs. 8.0 months [95% CI, 7.0-9.0 months], P = .38) and median OS (12.0 months [95% CI, 7.2-16.8 months] vs. 11.0 months [95% CI, 9.7-12.3 months], P = .10). Compared with EORTC principles, postoperative RT according to RTOG/NRG principles did not increase treatment-related toxicities and was equally effective for patients with grade 3-4 glioma, including the subgroup of patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma.
Medical subject headings
- Glioma
- Brain Neoplasms
- Practice Guidelines as Topic