The Role of Emergency and Primary Care in Combating the Rise of Gonorrhea: Another Purview Paradox?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39660675.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/21501319241303609 and PMC identifier 11632869.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Drug-resistant <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i> is an urgent threat to public health. Novel prevention and treatment strategies are emerging, including immunizations, pharmacologic post-exposure prophylaxis, rapid molecular resistance assays, and novel antibiotics. However, where and how such strategies are optimally implemented remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective interrupted time series analysis of gonorrhea cases reported to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. We collected names of treating providers from 2011 (n = 100) and 2022 (n = 108), and cross-referenced provider names with publicly available records from the Massachusetts Boards of Registration in Medicine and Nursing to identify provider type, specialty, year of terminal degree or licensure, and clinic type. Of 208 providers, 111 (53.4%) were advanced care practitioners. Providers treated cases predominantly in community health centers (n = 65, 31.3%) and emergency departments or urgent care centers (n = 60, 28.8%). Only 11 (12.4%) of 89 physicians were trained in either adult or pediatric infectious diseases. Our results indicate that the majority of gonorrhea cases in the Massachusetts are treated in non-specialty settings. The time is now to plan for implementation of the emerging strategies to avoid underutilization and assure uptake of interventions in settings positioned to reach persons diagnosed with gonorrhea who will benefit most.
Medical subject headings
- Gonorrhea
- Primary Health Care