Different measures of ventilatory efficiency in preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing are useful for predicting postoperative complications in abdominal cancer surgery.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39663552.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/aas.14562 and PMC identifier 11635061.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Ventilation as a function of elimination of CO<sub>2</sub> during incremental exercise (VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope) has been shown to be a valuable predictor of complications and death after major non-cardiac surgery. VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO<sub>2</sub>) are both affected by ventilation/perfusion mismatch, but research on the utility of PetCO<sub>2</sub> for risk stratification in major abdominal surgery is limited. We aimed to determine the correlation between VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope and PetCO<sub>2</sub> measured during preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and its association with major cardiopulmonary complications (MCPCs) or death following oesophageal and other major abdominal cancer surgeries. In a retrospective cohort of 116 patients undergoing preoperative CPET 2008-2023, VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope and PetCO<sub>2</sub> (kPa) were recorded. The main outcome was MCPC during hospitalisation or death ≤90 days of surgery. We determined threshold values for each measure, corresponding to 90% specificity, using receiver operating characteristics analysis. A strong negative correlation was found between PetCO<sub>2</sub> after a 5-minute warm-up and VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope (Pearson r = -.88). In oesophagus cancer, VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope >38 and PetCO<sub>2</sub> < 4.1 kPa (30.8 mmHg) were both significant thresholds for the main outcome. For other major abdominal surgery patients, threshold analyses were non-significant. The area under the curve to predict outcome was similar using VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope (0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.89) as compared to PetCO<sub>2</sub> (0.71, 0.53-0-90). Both preoperative VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope and PetCO<sub>2</sub> could identify subjects with a very high risk of complications following oesophageal resection, with similar prognostic utility. PetCO<sub>2</sub> can be measured with simpler equipment and could therefore be useful when CPET is not available.
Medical subject headings
- Postoperative Complications
- Exercise Test
- Abdominal Neoplasms