Design Rational for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: An Update.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39813133.
- Also identified by DOI 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00559.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The design of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) systems is rapidly evolving as device companies try to keep pace with the expansion of surgical indications and a refinement of techniques for TAA. Even since the publication of the latest "update," published in 2018, three new designs and three updates on preexisting third-generation implants came onto the market. Improvements in third-generation TAA systems include minimal bone resection, retaining ligamentous support, and anatomic balancing. Fourth-generation systems use 3D printing technology, improved talus and tibia designs based on CT scans of arthritic and normal ankles, and include patient-specific instrumentation. We will then explore the short-term and mid-term outcomes of the previously discussed six TAA systems-INBONE, INFINITY, INVISION (Stryker), Salto-Talaris (Smith and Nephew), Scandinavian Total Ankle Arthroplasty (Enovis), Trabecular Metal Total Ankle (Zimmer Biomet), and VANTAGE (Exactech). As more research pours in regarding mid- to long-term outcomes of these implants, it is important to assess the design rationale and summarize current outcome data for these implants.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle
- Prosthesis Design
- Ankle Joint
Anatomy
- ankle