The Determinants of Toxicity in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer With a Focal, Intraprostatic "Microboost".
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39855400.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.01.008 and PMC identifier 12276924.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A single-phase 3 trial has demonstrated that prostate radiation therapy with a focal, intraprostatic "microboost" can improve disease control without an overall increase in toxicity. It is unclear how these results generalize to other treatment schedules and protocols. A systematic search of PubMed and the Cochrane review was performed for studies published on or before September 1, 2023. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the cumulative incidence of grade ≥2 (≥G2) acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Heterogeneity was assessed, and the association of trial-level covariates with toxicity was examined via the subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Odds ratios (ORs) for dose metrics were reported per Gy equivalent dose in 2Gy per fraction (EQD2). Thirty-eight patient cohorts were included. The pooled estimate of the cumulative incidence of ≥G2 acute and late GU toxicity was 25.3% (95% CI, 19.1%-32.8%) and 21.1% (95% CI, 16.7%-26.3%), respectively. Late ≥G2 GI toxicity was less frequent, estimated at 5.6% (95% CI, 3.5%-8.7%) and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.6%-10.1%), respectively. Subgroup factors associated with at least one ≥G2 toxicity category were treatment technique, imaging used for boost volume definition, intrafraction motion management, trial phase, and toxicity grading. Rectal D<sub>Max</sub> was associated with acute ≥G2 GI toxicity (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; P < .001). Additionally, urethral D<sub>Max</sub> was associated with late ≥G2 GU toxicity (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P < .001), and a stronger relationship was observed with the average plan urethral D<sub>Max</sub> (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07; P < .001). No association of toxicity with any bladder dose metric examined was observed. The utilization of a microboost seems tolerable across treatment protocols; however, subgroup factors, including the use of intrafraction motion management and the type of imaging modality used, may influence the probability of toxicity. Attention to rectal D<sub>Max</sub> constraints and urethral D<sub>Max</sub> dose constraints may help to mitigate GI and GU toxicity, respectively. No association between toxicity and bladder dose constraints was observed.
Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Radiation Injuries