Aesthetic Efficacy and Safety of Combined Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization and Calcium Hydroxylapatite Treatment: A Systematic Review of Human Evidence.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39883075.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/asj/sjae239 and PMC identifier 12080884.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Although microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) and calcium hydroxylapatite- carboxymethylcellulose (CaHA-CMC) have their individual strengths and have demonstrated effectiveness in aesthetic improvement and improving skin laxity, a combined treatment may sometimes be required to achieve comprehensive aesthetic enhancements that meet patients' needs and preferences. This review systematically summarizes the available evidence on combined MFU-V and CaHA-CMC treatment. A comprehensive search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE ALL (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central. We included studies conducted in adults that examined the effectiveness, safety, and/or mechanism of action of combined MFU-V and CaHA-CMC treatment. Out of 4019 references, 11 studies, mainly pre-post studies, were included in this analysis. Overall, regardless of the area treated, improvements in global aesthetic scales, skin quality parameters, and patients' satisfaction following combined treatment, accompanied by mild to moderate adverse effects, were found. In addition, histological studies indicated increased neocollagenesis and elastin synthesis posttreatment. Our review highlights promising outcomes from combined MFU-V and CaHA-CMC treatment. Nevertheless, due to the limited number of studies, further research is essential to gain a deeper understanding of this combined treatment's efficacy, safety, and applicability.
Medical subject headings
- Cosmetic Techniques
- Dermal Fillers
- Durapatite
- Skin Aging
- Ultrasonic Therapy