Risk Stratification for Trial Enrichment Considering Loco-Regional Failure in Head and Neck Cancer: UICC8 Versus Purpose-Built Failure-Type Specific Risk Prediction Model.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39890609.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/hed.28085 and PMC identifier 12146813.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A previously published failure-type specific risk model showed good performance in the original cohort. to validate the model and separate patients with high- and low-risk loco-regional failure (LRF). to identify patients potentially suitable for treatment intensification trials. Validation data: 756 patients from two institutions (different countries). Predictive performance was evaluated by Brier scores and AUCs. Discriminatory performance was compared to Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging (versions 7 and 8). The model's 3-year AUC for LRF was 65%, significantly better than UICC7 staging, but no significant difference to UICC8. Model-based risk stratification and UICC8 both identified high-risk patient groups with 3-year LRF ≈30%. The population mean was 18%. The model performed well on a group level. UICC8 staging performed equally well. Although developed for the endpoint of OS, an improvement from UICC version 7 to version 8 was evident also for the prediction of LRF.
Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local