Resectable Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma in the Immunotherapy Era: Upfront Surgery vs. Neoadjuvant Therapy.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39906003.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/hed.28098 and PMC identifier 12158567.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We aim to evaluate outcomes for patients with resectable SNMM treated in the immunotherapy era. Thirty-seven patients with resectable SNM were identified using our institutional database between 2016 and 2023. Patients receiving neoadjuvant Ipi/Nivo (46%, n = 17) were more likely to have disease involving the sinuses and/or the skull base (71% vs. 35%, p = 0.05). The overall response rate to Ipi/Nivo was 24%. Two-year LRFS from the start of therapy was 63%, and from the end of local therapy was 78%. Two-year PFS was 49%. The patients who received Ipi/Nivo with evidence of response (n = 4, 24%) had better PFS (2-year PFS 100% vs. 15%, p = 0.02) and LRFS (2-year LRFS 100% vs. 31%, p = 0.08). Outcomes for resectable SNMM patients continue to be poor in the immunotherapy era. In the context of selection bias, neoadjuvant Ipi/Nivo was not associated with better outcomes in all-comers. However, those with evidence of response to Ipi/Nivo had better prognosis.
Medical subject headings
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Melanoma
- Immunotherapy
- Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms