Improving quality and outcomes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in refractory cardiac arrest: the Phoenix ECPR project.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39914994.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002934 and PMC identifier 11804202.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Survival for cardiac arrest remains poor, and the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been suggested as a potential therapy to improve outcomes. Harefield Hospital has been performing ECPR for over a decade; however outcomes have been historically poor. A retrospective analysis was performed of all ECPR cases at Harefield Hospital between April 2018 and April 2023. A new structured system including a systematic screening process, strict exclusion criteria, assessment of resuscitation adequacy through physiological stop criteria, drilled and standardised cannulation process, post-resuscitation care and neuroprognostication was rolled out on 1 April 2023. A comparison of ECPR performed pre and post was undertaken. With the institution of the new system, 13 patients were treated with ECPR over 1 year; of which nine (69.2%) survived with good neurological outcomes at 6 months. In the preceding 3 years, there had been 22 cases; of which, two survived (9.1%). This was a statistically significant higher survival with HR of 4.56 (CI 2.1, 10.2, p<0.05).The average length of hospital stay in the new system was 61.3 days; of which, 32.4 days were in the intensive care unit. This study shows that it is possible to significantly improve outcomes in ECPR in a single centre by introducing into standard practice, a high-quality bundle of care.
Medical subject headings
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- Heart Arrest
- Quality Improvement