A direct hit.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39932436.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1126/science.adw6467.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Earlier this month, the Trump administration set off a frenzy in the US scientific community when the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced that indirect cost reimbursement for federally funded research would be capped at 15%, a drastic cut from a usual range of 50 to 70%. In the American system, a federal research grant comes with one component that pays the direct costs of research-covering salaries of the researchers and supplies and equipment they use-and a so-called indirect component that represents the government's contribution to facilities and administration-the overhead necessary to do the work. The indirect contribution does not cover everything needed to support the research; the remainder is provided by the university. This agreement between higher education and the government has been a hallmark of the funding system for 70 years. The scientific community must unite in speaking out against this betrayal of a partnership that has enabled American innovation and progress.
Medical subject headings
- National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
- Financing, Government
- Biomedical Research
- Research Support as Topic