Lack of harmonisation of greenhouse gases reporting standards and the methane emissions gap.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39934165.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41467-025-56845-3 and PMC identifier 11814072.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Monitoring companies' contributions to climate dynamics and their exposure to transition risks requires accurate measurements of their non-carbon dioxide greenhouse gas emissions (non-CO<sub>2</sub> GHG). However, carbon accounting standards are not harmonised and allow for some discretion when converting emissions of different GHGs into CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent units, the currency in which carbon footprints are expressed. Focusing on methane, we build counterfactual harmonised standards using the latest IPCC Global Warming Potential (GWP) values over 100 years and estimate a cumulative gap in reported methane emissions of 170MtCO<sub>2</sub>e ( ~6Tg) over a sample of 2864 companies. Changing the counterfactual from GWP<sub>100</sub>to GWP<sub>20</sub>, as recently codified in certain jurisdictions and initiatives, increases the cumulative gap to 3300MtCO<sub>2</sub>e ( ~40Tg). The gap only covers direct emissions and hence understates the extent of potential under-reporting across value chains. Overall, our study underscores the importance of global harmonisation of CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalence standards to coherently track corporate GHG emissions and their exposure to transition risks.