Distinct input-specific mechanisms enable presynaptic homeostatic plasticity.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39951523.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1126/sciadv.adr0262 and PMC identifier 11827636.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Synapses are endowed with the flexibility to change through experience, but must be sufficiently stable to last a lifetime. This tension is illustrated at the <i>Drosophila</i> neuromuscular junction (NMJ), where two motor inputs that differ in structural and functional properties coinnervate most muscles to coordinate locomotion. To stabilize NMJ activity, motor neurons augment neurotransmitter release following diminished postsynaptic glutamate receptor functionality, termed presynaptic homeostatic potentiation (PHP). How these distinct inputs contribute to PHP plasticity remains enigmatic. We have used a botulinum neurotoxin to selectively silence each input and resolve their roles in PHP, demonstrating that PHP is input specific: Chronic (genetic) PHP selectively targets the tonic MN-Ib, where active zone remodeling enhances Ca<sup>2+</sup> influx to promote increased glutamate release. In contrast, acute (pharmacological) PHP selectively increases vesicle pools to potentiate phasic MN-Is. Thus, distinct homeostatic modulations in active zone nanoarchitecture, vesicle pools, and Ca<sup>2+</sup> influx collaborate to enable input-specific PHP expression.
Medical subject headings
- Neuromuscular Junction
- Neuronal Plasticity
- Homeostasis
- Presynaptic Terminals