Clarifying the characteristics of interprofessional rehabilitation programs for adults with chronic low back pain: A scoping review.

Wami, Sintayehu Daba; Chala, Mulugeta Bayisa; Wolde, Sara Yirgalem; Donnelly, Catherine; Gelaye, Kassahun Alemu; Pullatayil, Abdul; Adefris, Esayas; Miller, Jordan · J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil · 2025

systematic_review · Level I

Where this comes from

Abstract

Interprofessional rehabilitation programs are recommended by practice guidelines based on their effectiveness in improving health-related quality of life, pain, and function for people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, the most appropriate program characteristics are poorly described in the literature. This scoping review aimed to synthesize the characteristics of interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people living with CLBP. The scoping review was guided by the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, which has been further enhanced by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched to identify relevant published studies. Out of 13370 articles identified through our search, seventy-nine studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria. In the majority of the studies (n = 75), interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people with CLBP consisted of two or more of the following interventions: physical activity and exercise (n = 68), education (n = 61), psychotherapy (n = 52), and vocational support/advice (n = 31). In a few studies describing the underlying theories, the biopsychosocial model, which emphasizes the need to address social, psychological, and physical components in the management of CLBP, was the most often cited theoretical framework. There is substantial variation in how interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people with CLBP are conceptualized and evaluated. A detailed description of the intervention evaluated, and the underlying theoretical frameworks was also lacking in most studies. We recommend the use of a consistent term and components aligned with practice guidelines.

Medical subject headings