Environmental impact of TKA: Waste audit of hospital operating room compared to ambulatory surgery center.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40028186.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jor.2025.01.014 and PMC identifier 11871452.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The implications of global warming are ever increasing in today's society. As the number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed in the USA increases annually, the total waste produced from them will proportionally increase. This study hopes to quantify and compare the amount of waste created by a TKA in a hospital operating room (OR) and ambulatory surgery center (ASC) to evaluate for any differences in the amount and types of waste created. Waste audits were performed on 10 TKAs both at hospital OR and ASC OR. Waste was organized into 6 categories: normal solid waste, recyclable plastics, biohazard waste, laundered linens, sharps, and polypropylene blue sterile wrap. Weight and volume for each waste stream were recorded using a digital scale and ruler. The total mass of waste produced was higher in hospital based TKAs than in the ASC cases (17.3 kg vs. 14.0 kg, p-value = 0.0028). There was significantly more mass of sterile, normal, and sharps waste at the hospital-based cases. Sterile waste was the largest contributor to the mass of waste in both settings. No difference existed in volume of waste between the hospital and ASC cases (305,866 cm<sup>3</sup> vs 260,052 cm<sup>3</sup>, p-value = 0.2494). TKAs in both settings produce a large amount of waste. Performing TKAs at ASCs could be used to lower the amount of waste produced, resulting in long term benefits to both the environment and the healthcare system.