Differential Effect of Hospitalization on Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimated GFR.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40067355.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1681/ASN.0000000670 and PMC identifier 12342081.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Critical illness is known to acutely decrease eGFRdiff (estimation of GFR by cystatin C−estimation of GFR from serum creatinine [eGFRCr]), presumably because of loss of muscle mass falsely elevating eGFRCr. It is unknown whether this eGFRdiff effect occurs in all-cause hospitalizations and whether the effect persists after hospitalization. More hospitalization was associated with larger decreases in estimation of GFR by cystatin C compared with eGFRCr on measurements months after hospital discharge. Cystatin C has entered mainstream clinical care as a measure of kidney function, joining serum creatinine, which has been used for almost a century. However, many physicians notice that estimation of GFR from serum creatinine (eGFRCr) and estimation of GFR by cystatin C (eGFRCys) values can differ considerably. Hospitalization with critical illness is known to acutely decrease eGFRdiff (eGFRCys−eGFRCr). However, whether this effect occurs in all-cause hospitalizations and persists after hospitalization is unknown. Among 5599 adult participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort study with serum creatinine and cystatin C measurements, we estimated the association of six categories of total days of hospitalization between annual study visits (never hospitalized, hospitalized <7, 7 to <14, 14 to <28, 28 to <42, and ≥42 days) and changes in eGFRCr, eGFRCys, and eGFRdiff between those study visits. Compared with no hospitalization between study visits, increasing days of hospitalization were associated with decreases in eGFRCys (<i>e.g</i>., −3.30 [95% confidence interval, −5.48 to −1.13] ml/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup> for ≥42 days of hospitalization, test for trend <i>P</i> < 0.001), while eGFRCr remained relatively stable (<i>e.g</i>., −1.12 [−2.77 to 0.53] ml/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup> for ≥42 days of hospitalization, test for trend <i>P</i> = 0.21). The differential effect resulted in eGFRdiff becoming progressively more negative with more total days of hospitalization (test for trend <i>P</i> < 0.001). Prolonged or repeated hospitalization was associated with larger decreases in eGFRCys compared with eGFRCr on measurements months after hospital discharge.