Species turnover does not rescue biodiversity in fragmented landscapes.

Gonçalves-Souza, Thiago; Chase, Jonathan M; Haddad, Nick M; Vancine, Maurício H; Didham, Raphael K; Melo, Felipe L P; Aizen, Marcelo A; Bernard, Enrico et al. · Nature · 2025

meta_analysis · Level I

Where this comes from

Abstract

Habitat fragmentation generally reduces biodiversity at the patch scale (α diversity)<sup>1</sup>. However, there is ongoing debate about whether such negative effects can be alleviated at the landscape scale (γ diversity) if among-patch diversity (β diversity) increases as a result of fragmentation<sup>2-6</sup>. This controversial view has not been rigorously tested. Here we use a dataset of 4,006 taxa across 37 studies from 6 continents to test the effects of fragmentation on biodiversity across scales by explicitly comparing continuous and fragmented landscapes. We find that fragmented landscapes consistently have both lower α diversity and lower γ diversity. Although fragmented landscapes did tend to have higher β diversity, this did not translate into higher γ diversity. Our findings refute claims that habitat fragmentation can increase biodiversity at landscape scales, and emphasize the need to restore habitat and increase connectivity to minimize biodiversity loss at ever-increasing scales.

Medical subject headings