Payer-Based Segregation in Obstetrics and Gynecology Ambulatory Care: Implications for Quality, Safety, and Equity.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40080824.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005883.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Separation of patients by insurance status in ambulatory care settings is a long-standing practice in academic medicine. This payer-based segregation of patients between resident and faculty outpatient practices may lead to inequitable quality of care. Informed by replies to a free-response text question for residents and program directors within the 2023 U.S. obstetrics and gynecology in-service examination, we provide commentary on this structural inequity within obstetrics and gynecology. The purpose of this commentary is to discuss the differences in patient population served, gaps in resources in resident clinics, quality of care and moral injury, limited continuity of care, and training and supervision. Further work is needed to guide systemic integration efforts and to explore the effects of program integration on patient health outcomes. We nonetheless urge academic medical centers to consider organizational shifts toward payer-integrated care.
Medical subject headings
- Gynecology
- Obstetrics
- Ambulatory Care
- Quality of Health Care
- Healthcare Disparities