The role of regional and practice trial sites in nonrepresentative randomized cancer trial enrollment.

Abstract

Representative trials are critical to advancing cancer treatment, yet little is known about how geographic siting contributes to nonrepresentative enrollment. Using patient-level data, we determined how the choice of trial-enrolling regions and practices impacts representativeness. We created a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare cohort of people aged 65 years and older with lung, breast, pancreatic, or renal cancer (2014-2019). We identified randomized cancer drug trial participants and determined their prevalence by advanced age (those aged 75 years and older), sex, race, ethnicity, and rural residence in the full cohort, trial-enrolling regions, trial-enrolling practices, and trials. The choice of region and practice contributed to more than 50% of the underenrollment of Black, Hispanic, and rural patients. Cancer trials enrolled 45% fewer Black patients than expected with proportional representation. Trial recruitment in regions and practices with proportionately fewer Black patients accounted for 27% and 35% of this disparity, respectively. These findings suggest that diversifying cancer trials requires changing the regions and practices referring and enrolling patients.