Surveillance for Metastasis in Low-Risk Uveal Melanoma Patients: The Need for Optimization.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40118154.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.03.019.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the effectiveness of surveillance protocols using hepatic ultrasonography (US) at 6-month intervals to detect metastasis and determine its impact on overall survival (OS) in patients with low-risk uveal melanoma (UM). Retrospective cohort study. A total of 144 consecutive patients with class 1 (low risk) primary UM were enrolled. All patients had negative baseline systemic staging, after which they underwent systemic surveillance with hepatic US at 6-month intervals: standard protocol (SP) or enhanced protocol (EP) using high frequency (US every 3 months) or enhanced modality (EM) (hepatic computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging). Largest diameter of largest hepatic metastasis (LDLM), number of hepatic metastatic lesions, time to detection of metastasis (TDM), and OS. Median follow-up time for those still alive (134 [10 patients died of any cause]) was 50.6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 28.6-76.1). Surveillance was done with SP in the majority (101 [70%]) and EP in 43 (30%). A total of 834 US scans were obtained (median 5.0 [IQR, 3.0-8.0]) that led to the detection of metastasis in 6 patients by SP in the majority (5 of 6) and EP in 1 of 6. The median LDLM at detection was 2.8 cm. Only tumor largest basal diameter was significantly associated with increased hazard of metastasis (hazard ratio, 1.33 [95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.70]; P = 0.022), whereas age, tumor thickness, and PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) status were not. All patients were treated for metastasis (liver directed 1 [17%], systemic therapy 5 [83%]). The vast majority of patients with UM predicted to have a low risk of metastasis do not develop metastasis by 5 years (96%). Surveillance protocols in such patients have very low yield, and their impact on survival cannot be assessed. Our study demonstrates the need for further risk refinement of patients with low-risk UM to better identify at-risk individuals. Currently used surveillance protocols need to be optimized. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
- Uveal Neoplasms
- Liver Neoplasms