Is Immobilization Necessary After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40143784.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/15589447251325825 and PMC identifier 11951119.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common fractures in adults. With the increased trend in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a volar locking plate, the postoperative rehabilitation course remains debated and whether or not a postoperative immobilization is necessary is unknown. PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were queried through August 2024. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies that compared patients undergoing immediate mobilization after ORIF for DRF with patients undergoing postoperative immobilization. Adverse events, patient-reported outcomes measures, and range of motion (ROM) were all compared between the 2 groups at various postoperative time points. Four randomized controlled trials were included in this study. No difference was seen in the risk of complications (odds ratio = 1.17, <i>P</i> = .70) and reoperations (odds ratio = 1.35, <i>P</i> = .53) between the 2 groups. The immediate mobilization group had lower pain scores at 6 months (mean difference = -0.46, <i>P</i> = .005) and lower Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand at 3 months (mean difference = -0.45, <i>P</i> = .002), and 6 months (mean difference = -0.46, <i>P</i> = .005). As for ROM, better forearm rotation was seen in the immediate mobilization group at 6 months (mean difference = 3.43, <i>P</i> = .004).
Medical subject headings
- Radius Fractures
- Fracture Fixation, Internal
- Open Fracture Reduction
- Immobilization
- Postoperative Care
Anatomy
- radius
- wrist