On the PTV homogeneity objective in the era of photon advanced dose calculation algorithms: Bridging robust and PTV-based planning.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40189149.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110878.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The planning target volume (PTV) homogeneity objective was developed for previous-generation dose calculation algorithms. Advanced algorithms report doses to medium-in-medium (D<sub>m,m</sub>) and their values depend on the medium considered, breaking the link between uniform irradiation and dose homogeneity. This work revises the PTV homogeneity objective when high-density heterogeneities are involved. We evaluated robust against PTV-based planning, and a dose reporting method that removes composition dependencies to express doses to muscle in muscle-like medium (D<sub>muscle,muscle*</sub>). Four cases featuring bone or metal within the PTV were selected and planned in RayStation with Monte Carlo. Three plans were created for each case: robust optimization for D<sub>m,m</sub> (Robust-D<sub>m,m</sub>), and PTV-based optimization for D<sub>m,m</sub> (PTV-D<sub>m,m</sub>) and D<sub>muscle,muscle*</sub> (PTV-D<sub>muscle,muscle*</sub>). The plans were reported in D<sub>m,m</sub> and D<sub>muscle,muscle*</sub>, and their dosimetric parameters, robustness, complexities, and optimization times were assessed. Robust-D<sub>m,m</sub> and PTV-D<sub>muscle,muscle*</sub> plans presented similar D<sub>m,m</sub> distributions with inhomogeneous PTV doses due to cold spots in high-density regions. PTV-D<sub>m,m</sub> plans achieved homogeneous PTV doses but required local fluence compensations that impaired robustness, with significant hot spots, and increased complexity. Robust optimization was 7 to 11 times slower. Reporting in D<sub>muscle,muscle*</sub> restored consistency between PTV-based and robust evaluations. Robust optimization proves that PTV homogeneity should not be prioritized when advanced algorithms reporting D<sub>m,m</sub> are used with high-density heterogeneities. PTV-D<sub>muscle,muscle*</sub> optimization offers a practical alternative for maintaining PTV-based planning and the PTV homogeneity objective while ensuring consistency with robust optimization. D<sub>muscle,muscle*</sub> reporting simplifies plan evaluation and aligns with clinical practice, facilitating decision-making in treatment planning.
Medical subject headings
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
- Algorithms
- Photons