Expert Perspective: How, When, and Why to Potentially Stop Antiresorptive Drugs in Osteoporosis.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 40211796.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/art.43179 and PMC identifier 12479181.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a chronic disease, and antiresorptive treatments are often continued for many years. Despite their established efficacy in reducing fracture risk, the most commonly used antiresorptive treatments, bisphosphonates and denosumab, have short- and long-term risks that, coupled with their benefits and other unique characteristics, influence consideration for at least periodic discontinuation. Bisphosphonates retain their effects even after discontinuation due to their prolonged skeletal retention, whereas denosumab discontinuation is associated with a rapid rebound in bone turnover and increased fracture risk. There is controversy about how, when, and why to potentially stop these agents. We discuss both permanent and temporary discontinuation of long-term treatment with bisphosphonates and denosumab. We focus on the reasons and timing for discontinuation as well as strategies to mitigate future fracture risk.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Density Conservation Agents
- Denosumab
- Osteoporosis
- Diphosphonates
- Withholding Treatment
- Osteoporotic Fractures